The largest open database of companies in the world

Part 10 in a series on the fundamentals of legal entity identity data. In the first post of this series, we introduced the traditional three-part taxonomy of legal personality: the natural person, the group acting in a defined capacity, and the legal construct. We flagged at the time that this was "a simplification that no longer represents legal reality" and promised to return to it. That debt comes due here. The taxonomy is not merely a simplification. It is a misleading frame – a tidy Victorian diagram that the law itself has been cheerfully dismantling for over a century – and this post retires it.

Part 9 in a series on the fundamentals of legal entity identity data. Before we can ask what good legal-entity identification has to do in the face of bad-actor use, we have to ask why legal entities are so useful to them in the first place. And that means asking: why are legal entities so attractive to those who want to move money, evade sanctions, launder proceeds, or sit out of reach of the law? Answer that, and what good identification has to do almost falls out.

Part 8 in a series on the fundamentals of legal entity identity data. The entity-initiated model is not a flaw of the LEI; it is the coverage model that made the LEI workable in the contexts it was designed for. But the same model imposes a per-entity cost of discovery, explanation, and registration – a cost that behaves very differently once you step outside the regulatory perimeter. In voluntary, market-driven contexts, where the number of entities needing identification runs into the hundreds of millions, that per-entity friction is the binding constraint. No amount of operational improvement, and no reduction in fees, can close a gap that multiplies with every legal entity created.

Part 7 in a series on the fundamentals of legal entity identity data. Commerce is going digital. Not "paper to PDF" digital — structured, machine-executed, real-time digital. And the one thing digital commerce cannot tolerate is ambiguity about who is on the other side.